Kyle Wiggs / Writing

Writing

Portfolios & risk

Systematic investing, what a risk score measures, and how models actually work.

18 pieces

Portfolios & risk

What a risk score does not measure →

One number, produced from a questionnaire, standing in for three separate questions. It demonstrates well and it hides the two that matter most.

Portfolios & risk

What systematic actually means →

The word gets used to mean disciplined, or quantitative, or unemotional. It means something narrower and more useful than any of those.

Portfolios & risk

What actually happens when a model changes →

The concept is simple. The operational reality is where firms discover what they actually signed up for.

Portfolios & risk

Why not just buy the index →

It is the best question a client can ask and most advisers answer it badly, by arguing with the premise instead of conceding it.

Portfolios & risk

The risk that only exists when money is moving →

The same set of returns in a different order is harmless in one phase of life and damaging in another. Nothing about the investments changes.

Portfolios & risk

What to say when markets fall →

The content of the conversation matters less than when it happens and who initiated it.

Portfolios & risk

What the fee actually buys →

Some of what advisers charge for is obviously valuable. Some of it is harder to defend than the industry likes to admit, and it is worth knowing which is which.

Portfolios & risk

How to talk about fees →

The discomfort is almost entirely about timing. Advisers who raise it early find it is not a difficult conversation at all.

Portfolios & risk

The concentrated position nobody wants to sell →

It is the largest single risk in many client portfolios, and the obstacles to fixing it are mostly not about tax.

Portfolios & risk

A bad benchmark is worse than none →

A mismatched comparison is not a neutral piece of information. It actively misleads, and it usually misleads in whichever direction is currently convenient.

Portfolios & risk

Something in the portfolio is always doing badly →

That is not a failure of the portfolio. It is the definition of the portfolio, and it is the reason clients find it so hard to hold.

Portfolios & risk

Rebalancing maintains risk, not returns →

It is frequently sold as a free source of return. It is a maintenance operation, and describing it otherwise is a claim nobody can substantiate.

Portfolios & risk

Two people, one portfolio, two risk profiles →

The instinct is to average them. That produces a portfolio that suits neither and leaves the actual disagreement undiscussed.

Portfolios & risk

The annual review is the wrong trigger →

Circumstances do not change on an anniversary. They change on specific days, and those are the days the profile is out of date.

Portfolios & risk

Conservative means something different to your client →

The words on the allocation menu are doing far more work than they can support, and everyone assumes they mean the same thing by them.

Portfolios & risk

The portfolio is rarely the largest risk →

Everyone measures the investments. The bigger exposures are usually somewhere the risk questionnaire never looks.

Portfolios & risk

Flows measure plumbing more than conviction →

They get reported as though they revealed what investors think. Most of what they reveal is structural.

Portfolios & risk

The proposal is a sales document →

It is built to win the relationship. That is a different job from describing what the client is about to live through.