Start here
This site is large. Rather than make you guess, here is where to begin.
There are 150 pages here. You almost certainly want one of six paths, and this page exists so you do not have to guess which.
An adviser doing diligence
What UX Wealth Partners does and what it does not. Then the disclosures — I own the models the platform runs, and you should read that before the sales page rather than after. Then what a TAMP actually costs, which is written against my own interest.
A journalist or a producer
Topics, a short biography you can cut straight into a programme, and a headshot. Previous appearances, and the ratings with their criteria — including which of the two was paid for. Deadlines get answered fastest on LinkedIn.
Someone considering working here
Why four companies, and why in that order. Then the leadership writing, which is the most honest account available of how I run things — including being the bottleneck and what I got wrong about scale.
Weighing a partnership or an investment
All four, including the one that does not fit the thesis. Then the affiliations in full, and the public registration record, which is maintained by regulators rather than by me.
We met, and you are checking
If what stuck was the idea rather than the résumé, go straight to The Three Risks or what going independent actually costs. The résumé version is on the biography.
You want to argue with something
89 pieces across six sections and a 37-term glossary. Nothing is gated and nothing claims an investment result. If a piece is wrong, the contact page is the fastest way to tell me.
Read The Three Risks. It is the most useful idea here and the one I would most like to be argued with about.
If you would rather read the thing written against my own interest, read the recognition page, which says plainly which of my two industry listings was paid for and why that changes what it is worth.