The content of the conversation matters less than when it happens and who initiated it.
The single highest-value action is contacting them before they contact you.
A client who calls you is a client who has spent days worrying alone. A client you called is a client whose adviser was paying attention. Same information, entirely different relationship.
"Stay the course" as an opening line reads as dismissal, because it answers a question the client has not asked yet.
Ask what they are worried about specifically. Sometimes it is the portfolio. Frequently it is a job, an expense, or a family member, and the market is what made it surface.
General market commentary is available everywhere and is worth nothing coming from you. What they cannot get elsewhere is what this means for their plan.
Whether the withdrawal they need next year is affected. Whether anything about their goal has changed. That is the conversation only you can have.
Everyone has market commentary. You are the only person who can tell them what it means for their actual plan.
This is what an investment policy statement is for. It turns the discussion from an argument about who is right now into a decision about whether to depart from something you both agreed when nothing was happening.
Not what markets will do, not how long, not how far. You do not know, saying so costs nothing, and being wrong out loud costs a great deal.
It is also a claim you should not be making in writing.
A client who genuinely cannot hold a position will not hold it. Fighting to the last produces a worse outcome than helping them reduce to something they can actually keep.
A smaller position held is better than a larger one abandoned.
What they said, what you discussed, what was decided. It is a record, and it is the most useful input you will ever have to their behavioural profile.
Read next
Behavioural risk, defined →