A meeting that keeps happening about the same topic is usually not a communication problem. It is an ownership problem.
A topic comes up. It is complicated. A meeting is scheduled. The meeting recurs. Nobody can quite say what it produces.
Almost always the underlying issue is that no single person has authority to decide.
Because a meeting feels like progress and assigning authority feels like risk.
Group discussion also distributes responsibility, which is comfortable and is exactly why nothing concludes.
If nobody can decide alone, the meeting is not for deciding. It is for feeling like deciding.
For each recurring meeting, name the person who owns the decision it concerns. Then ask whether the meeting is still necessary.
Frequently it becomes a short written update, or disappears.
Anything requiring real-time disagreement. Anything where reading the room matters. Anything where several people hold pieces of information that have to be combined live.
That is a much shorter list than most calendars imply.
Reporting what happened is the clearest case of something that should be written. It is one-directional, it is preparable, and it consumes everyone simultaneously.
Write it. Use the time for the part that actually requires people in a room.
Meetings do not just consume the hour. They fragment the day around them, and attention is the real constraint.
Two meetings placed badly can remove most of the useful thinking time from a day that looks mostly free.
Read next
Capacity is not the same as busy →