Some of what advisers charge for is obviously valuable. Some of it is harder to defend than the industry likes to admit, and it is worth knowing which is which.
Coordination. Someone whose job is to hold the whole picture — accounts, obligations, tax situation, goals, the things about to happen — and make sure decisions in one area account for the others.
Nobody else in a client's life does this. Not the accountant, not the lawyer, not the fund manager.
Doing the work. Rebalancing, tax management, paperwork, chasing the transfer, filing the thing.
A client could do most of it. Almost none of them will, and the value of a task nobody does is not measured by its difficulty.
Security selection. This is where the index question lands, and where an adviser needs a real answer rather than an argument with the premise.
Most of the fee is for the decisions around the portfolio and almost none of it is for the contents.
Behavioural coaching. There is a genuine basis for the claim that advisers keep clients invested through conditions where they would otherwise sell.
The industry quantifies this with more confidence than the evidence supports. The qualitative version is defensible; the precise percentage usually is not.
Not having to think about it. The delegation itself is the product for many people, and it is rarely on the fee schedule.
Because clients increasingly ask, and an answer assembled in the moment sounds defensive.
A firm that can say plainly what it does, including the parts that are commoditised, is easier to trust than one that treats the question as an objection to be overcome.
Read next
How to talk about fees →